Saturday, June 04, 2005

New Labor

Josh Marshall asks if a strong labor movement is a prerequisite for progressive politics. The Duke asks a higher-level question -- how can labor be strong in today's global economy? The first challenge is to figure out how to unify workers across jobs, locations, and industries. Since people now change jobs roughly 10 times in a career, the age of the 30-year gold watch is fast disappearing. Imagine the power of a labor movement that was able to secure portable health care, portable pensions, and portable worker safety standards, not just from one individual's job to job, but across industries and even national boundaries. The old organizing mechanism of company or plant votes is probably not the way to achieve that. (The Duke is pro-business, pro-trade, and pro-technology, but also pro-labor -- the National Labor Relations Board and the rules governing union elections have been so gutted that it is both hard to organize and -- even worse -- hard for rank-and-file members to hold union leadership accountable).

The Duke is intrigued by the debate between AFL-CIO head John Sweeney and Andy Stern of the SEIU, but they are only scratching the surface. The Duke predicts that -- without more rapid change -- a new labor movement will arise completely outside of the boundaries of the AFL-CIO, and it may not even call itself labor.

2 Comments:

At 9:22 PM, Blogger The Duke said...

Roberta Lynch of AFSCME has a post at TPM Cafe bemoaning the current tone of the Stern/Sweeney contest for labor leadership.

She writes ...

To a disturbing extent, that bloc-building is based on highly public distortions of the views and records of those who refuse to join the SEIU camp--and a high gloss version of the records of those who have. So instead of serious thinking about the real challenges of organizing in today’s economic, political and social context, we get the Change to Win (CtW) folks’ incessant drumbeat that those who aren’t in their corner don’t care about organizing, don’t do organizing, only care about politics, only want to elect more Democrats, etc. etc. etc.

Change the names of the parties involved and you have a perfect description of the last two Presidential campaigns, at least from the view of most swing voters. I'm not actually saying that raw politics is a bad thing, but it strikes me as no different than the real political world that has existed outside the "House of Labor" for quite some time.

Roberta, I am not close enough to the specific issues to comment on whether or not enough substantive debate has taken place, but -- at the risk of sounding unsympathetic -- the discomfort you express at (horrors!) raw politics in the labor movement sounds a bit like the creaking of an old house undergoing much needed renovations.

See my earlier post articulating a much greater challenge to labor than who controls the AFL.

-- The Duke

 
At 3:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sponsored by MEDC and Michigan Small Tech Association Policy Forum Attendees.
cheap phentermine online
Acne At Huge Discount! Free Shipping On Acne

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com